Tag Archive | "difficult intubations"

How to Make the Difficult Airway Less Difficult

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Training, experience and planning can turn a difficult airway into just another day at the office. Photo Verathon Medical

We were on a tactical-EMS (TEMS) operation in February in the mountains of western Maryland. Several of us lamented, whined actually, about the cold, wet weather. Our TEMS team leader, Mark Gibbons, set us straight, “There’s no such thing as bad weather, just those ill prepared for current conditions.”

My friend’s statement easily applies to most difficulties we encounter in life. Tasks that we find troublesome are usually hard to manage because we are unprepared or conditions are unexpected. The same applies to airways we label as difficult.

In previous articles on airway anatomy, I discussed how understanding the anatomy helps us make better decisions and improves our level of success. The same paradigm applies to a “difficult airway.” As medical practitioners, the more clearly we understand why an airway is difficult, the less difficult it becomes to manage.

From Difficult to Everyday
Although there’s little you can do about your patient’s anatomy and physiologic condition, you still have to deal with it. I used to believe that I chose the laryngoscope blade for my patient. I was wrong; the patient picks the blade. I had to learn to perform a good patient assessment and really understand my patient’s needs. A good assessment only takes about a minute or so, but it’s a lot more than just glancing at the patient’s face. How far can you open the patient’s mouth? What’s the length of the jaw? Is the neck mobile? A short neck, short jaw and receding mandible calls for a straight blade, not a 3 Mac just because I like a curved blade. If you don’t listen to your patient, you’ll create a difficult airway.

Another thing we can’t change is our working environment. How many times have you used the “belly flop” intubation position on the floor? Sure, you can always move the patient from the bathroom to the living room, but it’s still a tough place to work. If you want to turn a tough position into a difficult airway, then never prepare yourself to work in that environment. The Maryland State Police Department runs a program called the Airway Rodeo. The final session is a scenario-based competition between teams. We place manikins in every position you can imagine: secured to a backboard, sitting up, even duct-taped to the underside of a table. The idea is to challenge our students to intubate in the most awkward, absurd positions we can envision so when they’re faced with something similar in the field, the patient position doesn’t make the situation a difficult airway.

Training and experience are two factors that can turn a difficult airway into just another day at the office. Of course, it works the other way too. The great part is that you have complete control over both of these factors. There’s always time to train. Commit just 30 minutes a day to your profession. Read an article. Listen to a podcast. Review a peer’s patient care report. Talk to someone who’s been there, done that. Case reviews and scenario-based training are the best way to become experienced before you’re faced with a real patient. Don’t let a lack of training and experience create a difficult airway situation.

For the past 10 years, Dr. Richard Dutton, trauma anesthesiologist at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, has been a mentor and friend. His view on equipment has made a huge impression on me. Our equipment should be simple, we have to know how to use our tools, and our equipment must be readily at hand. Now, I’m a big widget guy. But we all know the chances of something actually working in an emergency is inversely proportional to the number of moving parts. It’s OK to have an airway gadget with a lot of parts as long as you’re prepared for them to fail and you’re prepared to deal with it. Know your equipment and have it with you. As Dr. Dutton is fond of saying, “If it’s not within three feet of you, it may as well be on Mars.” You’re a professional; don’t allow equipment issues to create a difficult airway situation.

Conclusion
Failing to have a plan, failing to understand a plan and failing to follow a plan have led many a good medical professional down long, torturous roads. My gosh, folks! We’ve got more algorithms than I can count, so I know you’ve got one for managing a patient’s airway. Know it and use it. Airway management, and especially endotracheal intubation, is a high-consequence therapy. Your plan should be simple to follow, flexible and well practiced. At a minimum, it should provide strategies based on patient assessment, environmental conditions, distance to a hospital and available equipment. A task force of the American Society of Anesthesiologists recognized this in 1992 and said it best in their 2002 update, “ … the use of specific strategies facilitates the intubation of the difficult airway.”(1) Don’t create a difficult airway by failing to plan.

Situational awareness is the proper alignment of your perception of reality with reality.(2) In one study, the U.S. Coast Guard found the lack of situational awareness accounted for 54% of medium- and high-severity towing vessel incidents.(3) Every profession has a book full of examples of adverse incidents that occurred because of poor situational awareness. Airway management is no different.

I arrived as the second paramedic at motor vehicle crash. The patient was in the ambulance, so I hopped in the side door. I saw a used endotracheal tube on the floor, a bloody laryngoscope blade and the crew bagging the patient. I heard them say, “He’s clinched. You need to RSI him.” I started my assessment and found the patient’s “clinched jaw” was held securely in place with a tight-fitting cervical collar. Nonchalantly, I opened the front of the cervical collar and found a non-clinched, highly mobile jaw. What was a difficult airway turned out to be a case of poor situational awareness.

Those of you who have sat in on my lectures know I don’t think difficult airways are as common or as bad as we’re sometimes led to believe. I think that, for the most part, we control our destiny. Although you can’t control a patient’s anatomy or some of the situations in which we work, you’re at the helm in regards to training, experience, equipment, strategies and situational awareness. If I may be so bold as to modify Mark Gibbons’ quote, I would say, “there are no difficult airways, only providers ill prepared for current conditions.”

Be safe my friends.
charlie

References
1. American Society of Anethesiologists. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: An updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98:1269–1277.
2. Personal communication with Commander Curtis Ott, USCG (ret). June 2008.
3. Crew Endurance Management, USCG, 2008, p 1

Post to Twitter

Charlie Eisele, BS, NREMT-P

Charlie Eisele, BS, NREMT-P has been active in EMS since 1975. After 22 years of service, he recently retired from the Maryland State Police, Aviation Command where he served as a State Trooper, flight paramedic, instructor, flight operations supervisor, director of training, and tactical paramedic.

For over 25 years, Charlie has been a collegiate level educator and curriculum developer. He has served numerous programs including the University of Maryland, and its R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, College of Southern Maryland, Grand Canyon National Park, Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia Department of Fire Programs, and Maryland State Police.

Charlie is the co-developer of the internationally delivered advanced airway program at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center. He is the Airway and Cadaver Lab Course manager for the University of Maryland critical care emergency medical transport program. He’s the co-developer of the EMS Today airway and cadaver lab program. Charlie has been recruited nationally to provide airway management curriculum and education for a variety of private, federal, state and local organization.

Charlie is an Eagle Scout and a published author. He serves on the Journal of Emergency Medical Services Editorial Board and is a member of the program board for the EMS Today Conference & Exposition.

More Posts

The Video Laryngoscopy Movement

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


By John Allen Pacey, MD, FRCSc

In 1829, the first known device for direct laryngoscopy was invented by British physician Benjamin Guy Babington. Later, the work of the widely recognized father of laryngology, Manuel Garcia, led to the first mirror laryngoscope prior to 1849, with a light source later introduced by Alfred Kirstein in 1895.(1)

In the century since then, the devices available to view the larynx have gone through many evolutions. Most devices have been difficult to use, and injuries related to failed or delayed tracheal intubation have resulted. Recognizing that optimal airway management involves the direct visualization of the airway during intubation, modern direct laryngoscopy has produced different blade lengths, prisms and fiber-optic light channels. However, the emergence of video capabilities in the surgical suite was perhaps the most significant step in laryngoscopy development.

Video laryngoscopy systems provide a clear picture of the larynx and vocal cords on a display monitor, enabling control of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in its trajectory toward the airway. This type of clearly displayed view facilitates fast, accurate ETT placement in difficult airways, preventing complications resulting from improper tube placement.

Other advantages of video laryngoscopy compared with older, fiber-optic systems are substantial. Video images are easily stored on servers and low-cost SD cards, and can be transmitted to other users, allowing for remote recording of activity, skills coaching and quality assurance reviews. The use of Internet display is easy either with real-time transmission or by display of the captured images, so that the captured sequences can be used for teaching purposes to improve the skills of many. As HDTV technology improves, so will the image quality of video laryngoscopy. Last, video laryngoscopic techniques are easier to master than those necessary for direct laryngoscopy, an important factor in its successful use by personnel working in less-than-optimal circumstances.

Initial advocates of video laryngoscopy were anesthesiologists in Vancouver, Canada, who performed intubations daily. Such luminaries as Richard Cooper, BSc, MSc, MD, FRCPC; John Doyle, MD, PhD; and Ron Walls, MD, raised questions about the viability of direct laryngoscopy compared with video laryngoscopy and sponsored the adoption of the technology in other areas of the hospital, such as the emergency department (ED) and the ICU. While recognizing the expense of adding the video component, Cooper in particular has commented that video laryngoscopes are “more robust and resistant to damage.”(2) Adoption in EDs and ICUs has been rapid, and it seemed only a matter of time until video laryngoscopy was introduced into prehospital medicine.

The Need in the Field
The literature shows that intubation performed in an out-of-hospital emergency environment carries with it a higher rate of complications and death.(3) Rapid sequence intubation (RSI), called for by Rosen and others, initially appeared to be effective when coupled with direct laryngoscopy (97% in some reports).(4) But optimism dissipated when a 2003 San Diego study reported that 45% of “easy” or successful intubations carried out on head-injured patients were associated with hypoxemia or bradycardia.(5)

In pediatric patients, the literature shows a need for improved methods. A 2000 San Diego study of 305 pediatric patients showed a success rate of 57%, esophageal intubation of 2% and displaced ETT of 15%.6 An older study, from 1989, reported a 50% success rate in children one year in age or younger.(7)

The reasons for these failure rates are obvious to anyone who has worked in the field: the variable intubation skill levels among EMS personnel and adverse conditions, such as weather, limited lighting, foreign bodies in the airway and trauma (leading to hemorrhage and distorted anatomy). Because direct laryngoscopy in these conditions continues to be fraught with difficulty, EMS medical directors are reconsidering their airway management protocols. Although it’s clear some EMS personnel are able to overcome the deficiencies of direct laryngoscopy and produce acceptable results, the failure rates have provoked questions of whether direct laryngoscopy has become a “legacy technique,” introduced when there were no alternatives.(8)

GlideScope in Use
In 2001, the GlideScope® was introduced as the first commercially available video laryngoscope. The device was designed with the recognition that a camera positioned away from the tip of the device would provide the best perspective and enhance visualization. The 60º angle allows for 99% Grade 1 and 2 views.2 Another significant design feature is the device’s unique anti-fog component, which reduces lens contamination.

The GlideScope Ranger single-use laryngoscope—designed to eliminate the need for disinfecting the blade for fast-paced intubation settings—is being used in Iraq and Afghanistan. The backpack-sized, rugged and shockproof version of the original device with an antiglare screen was trialed at the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Fort Sam Houston and Andrews Air Force Base. Following successful trials of the device at these world-renowned medical facilities, the Ranger was deployed in hospitals and combat settings.

In particular, a number of reports from the Canadian Expeditionary Hospital in Kandahar, Afghanistan, involve the management of bloody airways, intubation around expanding hematomas and other challenging ETT exchanges. The Ranger is also in trials with Whatcom County (Wash.) EMS, where the early results are encouraging, according to Medical Director Marvin Wayne, MD.

Aeromedical applications, notably in helicopter environments, are also under study with the GlideScope Ranger. It’s notable that first-time aeromedical users had a high success rate even in the most adverse conditions. Reports of Ranger intubation under unusual conditions include two intubations prior to extrication from crushed vehicles, in flight re-intubation, and in-flight primary intubation (where direct laryngoscope use is limited).

A Look Forward
There’s considerable pressure on EMS to improve successful intubation rates, and the advent of video laryngoscopy designed for the field is poised to produce findings that support its use in this demanding context. How extensive a role this technology will play is complicated by the debate over whether intubation—considered the gold standard in anesthesia practice—is necessary for all compromised airways. EMS personnel work with patients who are often treated under adverse conditions, and there will always be a need for difficult airway management in the trauma setting. A growing amount of evidence supports the view that video laryngoscopy will be a standard in that setting, but more studies are needed before it’s an established reality.

As for speculation about the future of video laryngoscopy in the prehospital setting, aeromedical studies will likely continue to demonstrate the efficacy of RSI using video laryngoscopy. It’s felt that “time on the ground” can be significantly reduced by the use of video laryngoscopy-assisted RSI, either pre-flight or in-flight. Also, many feel RSI coupled with video laryngoscopy will be shown as the most effective strategy for prehospital intubation management, which will likely involve development of supraglottic airway technology.

The cost of failed or difficult intubation can be very high as reflected in a private settlement in excess of $15 million in 2002.(9) There’s also the cost associated with emotional burden to the providers involved, who may face insurmountable obstacles to care.

The added value of video recording will allow medical directors to more accurately measure personnel competency and skill success rates, document the depth of ETT insertion and enhance education. Overall, these devices can aid emergency airway management and likely lead to better patient care—a universal goal of all EMS providers.

References
1. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. vii:399–410, 1856.
2. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, et al: “Early clinical experience with a new video laryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients.” Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 52(2):191–198, 2005.
3. Murray JA, Demetriades D, Berne TV, et al: “Prehospital intubation in patients with severe head injury.” Journal of Trauma. 49(6):1065–1070.
4. Bulger EM, Copass MK, Maier RV, et al: “An analysis of advanced prehospital airway management.” Journal of Emergency Medicine. 23(2):183–189, 2002.
5. Dunford JV, Davis DP, Ochs M, et al: “Incidence of transient hypoxia and pulse rate reactivity during paramedic rapid sequence intubation.” Annals of Emergency Medicine. 42(6):721–728, 2003.
6. Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al: “Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome: A controlled clinical trial.” JAMA. 283(6):783–790, 2000.
7. Aijian P, Tsai A, Knopp R, et al: “Endotracheal intubation of pediatric patients by paramedics.” Annals of Emergency Medicine. 18(5):489–494, 1989.
8. Cooper RM: “Is direct laryngoscopy obsolete?” Internet Journal of Airway Manage­ment. Vol. 4, 2006–2007. www.adair.at/ijam/volume04/specialcomment01/default.htm
9. Law Offices of Wade E. Byrd, P.A. 232 Person St. Fayetteville, NC 28301.

Disclosure: The author is the inventor of the GlideScope, and president and research director for Verathon Medical Canada, the makers of GlideScope systems.

This article originally appeared in The Perfect View.

Post to Twitter


EMS Airway Clinic is a new site offering best practices in airway management and education for EMS professionals and educators, featuring:
  • • Regular articles by Charlie Eisele, Flight Paramedic, retired First Sergeant with the Maryland State Police Aviation Command, and co-founder of the Advanced Airway Course at EMS Today
  • • Case studies, how-to videos and podcasts
  • • The "Airway Funnies" from popular EMS cartoonist Steve Berry
  • • The latest news, features and educational content on prehospital airway management
  • Learn more about EMS Airway Clinic

    Like Us on Facebook

    Featured Airway Products

    Providing emergency patient care on the ground or in the air is complex and challenging. That's why the tools used by paramedics and EMTs must be adaptable in a constantly changing clinical situation — quickly operational, rugged and easy to use. Learn more about EMS airway management.

    GlideScope Ranger

    The GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscope delivers consistently clear airway views enabling faster intubations in EMS settings. Available in reusable or single-use configurations.

    See more products …

    GlideScope Cobalt AVL

    GlideScope Cobalt AVL

    The GlideScope Cobalt AVL video laryngoscope offers airway views in DVD-clarity, along with real-time recording. On its own or when combined with the GlideScope Direct intubation trainer, the Cobalt AVL is an ideal tool to facilitate instruction of laryngoscopy.

    See more products …

    GlideScope AVL Reusable

    GlideScope Cobalt AVL

    The GlideScope AVL Reusable video laryngoscope offers airway views in DVD-clarity, along with real-time recording. On its own or when combined with the GlideScope Direct intubation trainer, the AVL is an ideal tool to facilitate instruction of laryngoscopy.

    See more products …

    Featuring Recent Posts WordPress Widget development by YD